Sunday, May 25, 2014
Friday, May 16, 2014
Speaking of Idaho...
The Republican candidates for Governor had a televised debate, last night...
Wow... seriously, just wow. So much crazy on one stage. It defies commentary, just watch, and enjoy!
Wow... seriously, just wow. So much crazy on one stage. It defies commentary, just watch, and enjoy!
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Hey Wisconsin! Are You Watching This??
Idaho is in the northwestern region of the United States. The 14th largest, and the 7th least densely populated of the 50 United States. The largest city and capital is Boise. Residents are called "Idahoans". Idaho was admitted to the Union on July 3, 1890, as the 43rd state.
Idaho is a mountainous state with an area larger than that of all of New England. Idaho's nickname is the "Gem State", because nearly every known type of gemstone has been found there.In addition, Idaho is one of only two places in the world where star garnets can be found in any significant quantities, the other being India. Idaho is sometimes called the "Potato State" owing to its popular and widely distributed crop. The state motto is Esto Perpetua (Latin for "Let it be forever").
Idaho is also where my Mother was born and grew up. Where both my parents went to University and where to this day, I have a large number of relatives. It is also where, as a young child my family would often go for Summer Vacation, to visit my Grandmother, my Aunt and assorted cousins. The three day car trip was always exciting for me, travelling along interstate highway I-80, across the center of the United States, over the Continental Divide and into the Rocky Mountains.
A highlight was always visiting the area of Southern Idaho where my Mom spent most of her Childhood. A beautiful area long the Snake River known as "Thousand Springs"
I have wonderful memories of my childhood visits to Idaho, when my Grandmother later moved to Wisconsin a few years later, I was thrilled to have her closer, but part of me missed those trips out West to visit her. Yet as I got older I became aware of the social and political climate in Idaho and found my sense of nostalgia, and desire to go back and visit seriously diminished. Idaho like many parts of the Western and Southern United States is culturally very conservative.
Anti-LGBT sentiment, white supremacist groups and ultra conservative "militia movements" had found measures of support in the cultural landscape of the Gem State. Attempts to legislate bigotry into law have been as recent as February of this year. The Young Turks have the disturbing details...
So I had pretty much given up on the idea of ever visiting Idaho again. Certainly the idea of going there with my Husband was hard to envision. I had less concerns visiting Malaysia, a Muslim country that I have been to three times, and will be going to again in two weeks, than I did about going back to Idaho. Then, yesterday this happened.
Wait.. Gay Marriage is now legal in Idaho!!?? , but NOT in my home state of Wisconsin, So just to be clear, Idaho is now more progressive and has greater civil equality for its citizens than Wisconsin does. If Eric and I move back to the United States we would have more civil rights living in Idaho than in Wisconsin.
Wow...
The marriage equality map of the United States now looks like this... Green means gay marriage is allowed. Red means it isn't. Yellow means that a same-sex marriage prohibition in the state has been overturned but put on hold pending appeal..
One wonders what the great Progressive voice Robert "Fighting Bob" LaFollette would think of his home state now. The State with the motto "Forward" is now numbered among the most backward states in America.
Meanwhile in 2014 Wisconsin's Republican Governor, Scott Walker believes that enshrining discrimination into the State's constitution is part of a "healthy balance" on civil rights for Wisconsin's citizens
Wisconsin is truly on track to become "The Mississippi of the North".
Forward? Not so much.
Sunday, May 11, 2014
That Arc just just bent a little bit farther...
'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.' - Martin Luther King, Jr.
The past twenty four hours have been quite remarkable. First of all, we have the National Football League in the United States drafting a very talented college player from Missouri named Michael Sam.
Sam had a very successful college football career. As a senior in 2013, Sam recorded 11.5 quarterback sacks and 19 tackles for a loss. He led his college athletic conference, the SEC, in both categories, and tied Missouri's single-season record for sacks. After the season, Sam was named the South Eastern Conference's Co-Defensive Player of the Year.
Michael Sam was recently drafted to play for the NFL's St Louis Rams, not a big surprise right? So what is so remarkable about it? Well I'll let the video of the moment speak for itself.
The NFL was seen as a fortress of homophobia where being Gay was the ultimate barrier to playing at the professional level, that NFL just drafted its first openly Gay player.
I think the front page of the Huffington Post says it all..
Yet the arc of the moral universe wasn't quite finished bending this week. Down in the heart of the American "Bible Belt", more specifically, in the State of Arkansas.
The "bible belt" is an informal term for a region in the south-eastern and south-central United States in which socially conservative evangelical Protestantism is a significant part of the culture and Christian church attendance across the denominations is generally higher than the nation's average.
The Bible Belt consists of much of the Southern United States. It is personified by the social climate in states like Texas, Mississippi and Arkansas. In the Bible Belt, it's common to see bumper stickers that claim One Man + One Woman = Marriage, church billboards that command one to "Get right with Jesus," letters to the editor comparing gay marriage to marrying one's dog, and nightly news about homophobic attacks from "Pro Family" groups.
Yet this past week, the State of Arkansas joined the list of American states that have marriage equality for their LGBT citizens.
And last but not least, we have that bastion of camp and pop-music cheese that is the Eurovision Song Contest. The finals for this year, held last night in Copenhagen, Denmark, took place in the shadow of a growing divide between Western and Eastern Europe over the issue of LGBT Rights.
A poll conducted by the French Institute of Public Opinion (IFOP) found majorities in several Western European countries in favor of marriage and adoption rights for same-sex couples, with those in the Netherlands (85%), Germany (74%), Belgium and Spain (71% each) expressing the most support. In Scotland, the percentage of people who favor same-sex marriage has increased from 41% in 2002 t0 61% in 2010,
For those unfamiliar with the Eurovision Song Contest all you need to know is , the only thing Gayer than Eurovision is... okay, I really can't think of anything that is gayer than Eurovision. Maybe the Tony Awards, but only if Neil Patrick Harris is hosting. Anyway, you get the picture.
So while the contest is wildly popular in Eastern Europe, its inherent tolerance of Gays is not. So much so, that protesters in Armenia and Belarus created petitions asking their national broadcasters to edit a gay contestant from Austria, out of the live broadcast, though the European Broadcasting Union wouldn't allow that.
All in all, this past week was not a good one for homophobia. The arc of the moral universe just got a whole lot closer to justice. As much as I have enjoyed these news stories, it did make think of those people I know for whom the past week was seen as bad news rather than good.
There are friends you lose when decide to live outside the prison of the "the closet". It is regrettable, but it happens. I found myself thinking of one of those "lost friends" this past week. Someone who after our being friends for a quarter of a century, upon finding out the love of my life was a guy named Eric, abruptly ended that friendship without a word.
The past twenty four hours have been quite remarkable. First of all, we have the National Football League in the United States drafting a very talented college player from Missouri named Michael Sam.
Sam had a very successful college football career. As a senior in 2013, Sam recorded 11.5 quarterback sacks and 19 tackles for a loss. He led his college athletic conference, the SEC, in both categories, and tied Missouri's single-season record for sacks. After the season, Sam was named the South Eastern Conference's Co-Defensive Player of the Year.
Michael Sam was recently drafted to play for the NFL's St Louis Rams, not a big surprise right? So what is so remarkable about it? Well I'll let the video of the moment speak for itself.

I think the front page of the Huffington Post says it all..
Yet the arc of the moral universe wasn't quite finished bending this week. Down in the heart of the American "Bible Belt", more specifically, in the State of Arkansas.
The "bible belt" is an informal term for a region in the south-eastern and south-central United States in which socially conservative evangelical Protestantism is a significant part of the culture and Christian church attendance across the denominations is generally higher than the nation's average.
The Bible Belt consists of much of the Southern United States. It is personified by the social climate in states like Texas, Mississippi and Arkansas. In the Bible Belt, it's common to see bumper stickers that claim One Man + One Woman = Marriage, church billboards that command one to "Get right with Jesus," letters to the editor comparing gay marriage to marrying one's dog, and nightly news about homophobic attacks from "Pro Family" groups.
Yet this past week, the State of Arkansas joined the list of American states that have marriage equality for their LGBT citizens.
And last but not least, we have that bastion of camp and pop-music cheese that is the Eurovision Song Contest. The finals for this year, held last night in Copenhagen, Denmark, took place in the shadow of a growing divide between Western and Eastern Europe over the issue of LGBT Rights.
A poll conducted by the French Institute of Public Opinion (IFOP) found majorities in several Western European countries in favor of marriage and adoption rights for same-sex couples, with those in the Netherlands (85%), Germany (74%), Belgium and Spain (71% each) expressing the most support. In Scotland, the percentage of people who favor same-sex marriage has increased from 41% in 2002 t0 61% in 2010,
While in Eastern Europe we have seen the opposite trend. With Croatia and most notably, Russia, passing sweeping laws targeting Gays and Lesbians for discrimination.
So while the contest is wildly popular in Eastern Europe, its inherent tolerance of Gays is not. So much so, that protesters in Armenia and Belarus created petitions asking their national broadcasters to edit a gay contestant from Austria, out of the live broadcast, though the European Broadcasting Union wouldn't allow that.
The contestant in question, is an Austrian Drag Queen named Conchita Wurst. So in what is being seen as a collective European rebuke to Russia and its rabidly homophobic "macho man" President, Vladimir Putin, guess who won Eurovision 2014?

So in light of this past week I wonder what my old friend thinks of the NFL drafting Michael Sam. Knowing for the past few months that Sam was a Gay man, did he root for or against his Alma Mater's football team, at the University of Missouri? Will he root for or against the St. Louis Rams?
Does the courage of his anti-gay convictions extend to all aspects of his life, including football, or just to me? The likelihood is that I will never find out. Yet part of me hopes this past week has given him, and others who have the same fears and misconceptions he holds, something to think about. Seattle based writer and activist Dan Savage sums up the contradiction many people with anti-gay fears and phobias are perhaps struggling with after this week....
Congratulations Michael and Conchtia. You are helping that Arc of the Moral Universe to continue to bend towards justice. With your help, it is my hope that eventually everyone, lost friends included, will come long for the celebration.
Friday, May 02, 2014
The Problem With Taking Half a Step Forward...
Also the Boy Scout's Honor Society, the Order of the Arrow also defines youth members to be under the age of 21. This clearly becomes an issue when one part of the BSA considers you to be a youth, while another says you are an adult. So it was just a matter of time until this contradiction would surface in the area of Summer Camp Staffing.
The majority of Boy Scout camp staff are in High School and College, and under the age of 21. Yet if you are Gay, and over the age of 18, you are not not eligible to be in Boy Scouting. BUT, if you are still under 21, you are still "legal" to be a involved in other parts of the Scouting program, like Exploring, and Venture Scouts. This contradiction becomes a big issue when you want to work on a BSA Summer camp staff. MSNBC picks up the story..
![]() |
Scout Camp Staff - 1991 |
I worked on Boy Scout Camp Staff pretty much every Summer from age 16 until after I graduated from University. On all the staffs I worked on, there were people who talked about their wives and girlfriends pretty much constantly. There were staff members who worked at camp with their wives and girlfriends. I have friends who met their future wives and husbands while working at Scout Camp. There were more than a few staffers who even who dated girls from the local community.
All of that is a non-issue for the BSA. Yet this kid mentioning on Facebook that he was dating someone, and then someone else asking "what's his name?", that according to the BSA, is somehow bringing homosexuality into Scouting. Really?
The problem with taking half-steps forward, is they invariably cause you to stumble. By trying to change, yet not change, their problematic membership policies, the BSA has created a whole set of new problems for itself. When the current policy change went into effect, I remember a conversation with a friend of mine, where I mentioned the risk that this half-measure might create a "witch hunt" mentality among people uncomfortable with change. Resulting in instances where people specifically target youth who fall into this odd age loophole.
So the fact that the local Scouting organization, (or someone connected with it) , where Garrett Bryant lives was digging through this young man's Facebook profile is pathetic, disturbing and sadly not surprising. By leaving bigotry half-in place the BSA has sent a message that it is still acceptable to discriminate against people, as long as they are over the age of 18. I fear the situation that Garrett Bryant finds himself in will happen to more and more young men in Scouting as they turn 18 but are still able to be active "youth" members in various parts of the Scouting Program.
The problem with taking half-steps forward, is they invariably cause you to stumble. By trying to change, yet not change, their problematic membership policies, the BSA has created a whole set of new problems for itself. When the current policy change went into effect, I remember a conversation with a friend of mine, where I mentioned the risk that this half-measure might create a "witch hunt" mentality among people uncomfortable with change. Resulting in instances where people specifically target youth who fall into this odd age loophole.
So the fact that the local Scouting organization, (or someone connected with it) , where Garrett Bryant lives was digging through this young man's Facebook profile is pathetic, disturbing and sadly not surprising. By leaving bigotry half-in place the BSA has sent a message that it is still acceptable to discriminate against people, as long as they are over the age of 18. I fear the situation that Garrett Bryant finds himself in will happen to more and more young men in Scouting as they turn 18 but are still able to be active "youth" members in various parts of the Scouting Program.
As long as the BSA keeps taking only half-steps towards dealing with discrimination, Scouting as whole will continue to stumble.
Friday, April 18, 2014
As the Triduum Begins...
The Triduum most often refers to the Paschal Triduum (also known as the Holy Triduum or Easter Triduum), the final three days of Lent and Holy Week and thus the last three days before Easter Sunday.
The Paschal Triduum begins with the Mass of the Lord's Supper on the evening of Holy Thursday and continues until the start of the Easter Vigil on the evening of Holy Saturday.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Funny Odd Book Review - "The Next"
He never thought he'd become one of the agoraphobic sludges of New York City – trapped with one view of a courtyard and head full of wrenching memories.
Dumped, disconnected, and depressed, spying on the neighbors has become his only entertainment. Then, without warning, lascivious and suspicious behavior by the closeted lawyer in the huge apartment across the courtyard leads him to a spine-tingling conclusion…his neighbor is a murderer.
Perhaps collaborating with Detective Marzoli to catch the killer is the key to surviving a past and present that are literally strangling him to death? Perhaps this beautiful, fierce detective can bring life back to his life?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In recent years there has been something of a renaissance in LGBT fiction. A natural progression in many ways. Gay characters have been cleverly part of the written word for centuries. Yet when turning books into movies Hollywood famously "de-gayed" many of these stories to make it past the censors. Stories like Spartacus, From Here to Eternity and yes, even Harry Potter all had gay characters that never made the leap from page to screen.
Yet it was on the written page that many young Gays and Lesbians first got a tantalizing glimpse of a world, outside the fear and dread of being in the closet.
Yet it was on the written page that many young Gays and Lesbians first got a tantalizing glimpse of a world, outside the fear and dread of being in the closet.

Yet at the time, just finding a story where "Boy Meets Boy", was something of a revelation. Reading it felt incredibly risky, subversive even. But more than that, it showed a world where Gay people existed, and in spite of the risks, and dangers of living authentically, there was such a thing as a "happily ever after", for people like me.
Now years later, the social progress we have seen over the past decade, has prompted a new generation of writers to take a look at life, and fiction from a Gay-inclusive perspective. A lot of recent works have frankly been hit and miss. Yet in giving the premise of Alfred Hitchcock's "Rear Window" an updated treatment, New York author Rafe Haze, hits the mark.
I will be honest and admit I get bored with most Murder novels. Usually the hero is unbelievable, and the murderer so transparent, that I just want to turn to the last page and say arrest him or shoot him already! With "The Next", Haze has crafted a intricate patchwork of very believable characters. Giving us a front row seat, as the protagonist watches the lives of his neighbors through the windows across the courtyard from his apartment.
I love Hitchcock's rear window, whenever I am in New York walking on the street I often look up at the windows of apartment buildings and think that each lighted square is a story, and wonder what that story might be.
"The Next" takes us on that journey, but lets us imagine it without the cliche'd Hollywood romance. The love story here isn't shoehorned into the plot, it develops quite naturally, unexpectedly even. The sexuality of the main character is never waved like rainbow flag in the reader's face, but rather is treated as a development, instead of an event.
To call "The Next" a 'gay version of Rear Window', while not an inaccurate description, I feel does the book a disservice. It isn't a story that asks "what if Jimmy Stewart's character was Gay?" and then goes from there. Rather it it takes many of the elements of Rear Window, and allows us to experience them from a new perspective, that in this case, just happens to be in a world that includes Gay people.
Sounds like art imitating life if you ask me. I thoroughly enjoyed this book, and was surprised to learn it is Rafe Haze's first published novel. I look forward to see what he will write ... next.
"The Next", by Rafe Haze is available April 23rd, for download, from Wilde City Press.
To call "The Next" a 'gay version of Rear Window', while not an inaccurate description, I feel does the book a disservice. It isn't a story that asks "what if Jimmy Stewart's character was Gay?" and then goes from there. Rather it it takes many of the elements of Rear Window, and allows us to experience them from a new perspective, that in this case, just happens to be in a world that includes Gay people.
Sounds like art imitating life if you ask me. I thoroughly enjoyed this book, and was surprised to learn it is Rafe Haze's first published novel. I look forward to see what he will write ... next.
"The Next", by Rafe Haze is available April 23rd, for download, from Wilde City Press.
Friday, March 21, 2014
When Your 'Enemy' Dies...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the BBC:
The Reverend Fred Phelps Sr, founder of the Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas, died on Wednesday evening at 84.
The church, made up mostly of his family, rose to international notoriety with its practice of picketing funerals of fallen US troops. It claimed their deaths were punishment for America's tolerance of gay people. Their signs read "Thank God for dead soldiers" and "Thank God for 9/11" and the like, and bore messages offensive to gay and lesbian people.
Born in Mississippi in 1929, Mr Phelps was raised a Methodist and was selected to attend the US Military Academy. He was ordained a Baptist minister, though Westboro was not attached to any mainstream denomination.
Mr Phelps earned a law degree from Washburn University in 1964, but was stripped of his licence to practise in Kansas in 1979. The Kansas Supreme Court said Mr Phelps made false statements in documents and "showed little regard" for professional ethics.
I only met Fred Phelps once. It was in 1998. Phelps and members of his "congregation" (family members) had come to Chicago to protest at the Broadway United Methodist Church.
Born in Mississippi in 1929, Mr Phelps was raised a Methodist and was selected to attend the US Military Academy. He was ordained a Baptist minister, though Westboro was not attached to any mainstream denomination.
Mr Phelps earned a law degree from Washburn University in 1964, but was stripped of his licence to practise in Kansas in 1979. The Kansas Supreme Court said Mr Phelps made false statements in documents and "showed little regard" for professional ethics.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The church on Chicago's North side, is located in the Lakeview neighborhood, which is known as the center of Chicago's LGBT community. Phelps targeted the church in response to news that the Pastor, Greg Dell performed a service of Holy Union for two men in his congregation that September.
In response, members of many of the surrounding churches in the neighborhood, including Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, where I was member; turned out and formed a human "ring of love" that moved in a circle around the entire building, effectively cutting the Phelps clan off from access to the church or anyone attending that Sunday's services.
Purely by chance I found myself standing in a position in the ring, directly opposite Phelps for about ten minutes. While he screamed right into my face of how much God hated me, how much I was to blame for all the evils befalling America, how I was "most assuredly" going to die from AIDS and would burn forever in hell.
Then the ring started to move again, I smiled and said ; "Nice to meet you Mr. Phelps, thank you for your time." (I made a point of not calling him "reverend" hoping that would offend him,) and moved away hearing Phelps still ranting off into the distance.
Then the ring started to move again, I smiled and said ; "Nice to meet you Mr. Phelps, thank you for your time." (I made a point of not calling him "reverend" hoping that would offend him,) and moved away hearing Phelps still ranting off into the distance.
For a good part of the rest of that day I felt pretty good, and rather proud of myself. In my brief interactions with the infamous Fred Phelps, I kept my cool , didn't take the bait and try to argue with him, or get angry and rant back how he was the one who was behaving in ways that God would find offensive. I was polite, cheerful and confident.
I had only weeks before, come out to my own family. As I walked the few short blocks back up Broadway to my apartment, I felt flush with my new-found courage and pride as an out Gay Man. I would even go as far as to say I was feeling slightly superior, maybe even a little smug.
I had only weeks before, come out to my own family. As I walked the few short blocks back up Broadway to my apartment, I felt flush with my new-found courage and pride as an out Gay Man. I would even go as far as to say I was feeling slightly superior, maybe even a little smug.
Yet as the day went on, I found myself getting angrier and angrier. I started wishing I had yelled back at Phelps. I regretted not calling him out as a sad bitter, twisted evil pathetic waste of a human life. I so wished that I had told him that the God I know bears no resemblance to the one he claimed to speak for. That God was going to send HIM to hell for his horrific protest at the funeral of Matthew Shepard, only weeks before.
I stood looking out at the skyline of Chicago through my living room window seething at the lost opportunity. While glorious images of myself raging at Phelps in righteous indignation while he cowered behind a trash can, flooded my mind.
I stood looking out at the skyline of Chicago through my living room window seething at the lost opportunity. While glorious images of myself raging at Phelps in righteous indignation while he cowered behind a trash can, flooded my mind.
Then I realized, in that moment, by letting myself get so angry, I was letting Phelps win.
I sat down, opened a can cherry coke, and took a deep breath. As I calmed down, I knew that Fred Phelps was not someone to be hated, this was a man to be pitied. As I thought about that, all that anger faded away as quickly as it had come. After that day I really didn't give Phelps or his Westboro Baptist clan much thought. Aside from a passing item in the news about Phelps' despicable protests at the funerals of dead American service personnel, Fred Phelps, like the anger I felt that day, faded from my memory. Until this week.
A number of people have emailed me, asking if I was happy to hear of Phelp's death. Or did I feel that the LGBT community should picket his funeral and subject the Phelps family to same sort of torment and disrespect that he inflicted on so many other families over the years. As tempting as it is to say yes to that, cathartic even. The answer is, and must be... No.
The fact is, we all owe Fred Phelps a tremendous debt. His irrational hatred of others provided the greatest argument in favor of LGBT equality that anyone could have ever wished for. His vile rants and heartless acts of disrespect for people different than him, did more to advance the cause of diversity and equality than any court ruling or protest march ever could.
The brilliant, and chilling HBO original movie "Conspiracy", depicts the actual events at the Wansee Conference outside Berlin. Where officials of Hitler's Third Reich planned what history would come to know as the Holocaust. In one of the final scenes, Nazi SS General Reinhard Heydrich, shares a story that one of the other participants at the meeting told him about the dangers of allowing hatred of one group of people to consume your life.
Fred Phelps' true legacy is that he was, a one-man Gay Pride Parade.
So ...it was nice to meet you Mr. Phelps, thank you for your time.
Monday, March 17, 2014
Thursday, March 13, 2014
When Bubbles and Echo Chambers Become Prisons...
Political writer Brian Beutler has an interesting piece in the current issue of Salon Magazine that examines the effects of the Republican Party's complete inability to heed Maddow's very sage and relevant advice. Now a year and a half on from their 2012 humiliation, the GOP has instead, doubled down on the bubble. Having circled their conservative media wagons around their rapidly shrinking base, the Republican Party has decided that facts clearly have a liberal bias, so the GOP simply won't worry about them.
Inside the ever more tightly sealed echo chamber of conservative media and Republican politics, there are no Facts, just articles of faith. These include: Reagan = Good, Obama= Bad, Very, Very, Very, Bad. Any Republican who works with, supports ANYTHING done by, or even speaks nicely about Barack Obama is a RINO. (Republican In Name Only). Poor Americans = Lazy, "takers", Rich Americans = Hard Working "job creators".
Any government involvement in Health Care = Bad, Bad, Socialism! Medicare = Good , for well and better-off Seniors, (figure that one out.) Medicare = Bad, for poor Seniors. Libyan, Syrian, Egyptian, Palestinian and Iranian poor Muslims = Bad Terrorists. Saudi, UAE and Qatari rich Muslims who fund the terrorists = Good. The Affordable Care Act = Worse than the Holocaust. 9-11 = Happened before George W. Bush was President. Benghazi = Worst Terrorist Attack on Americans EVER. The Deficit = is going up.. WAY UP, (any numbers that say differently are lies put out by Obama and his accomplices in the liberal media.)
(I will pause here to allow for gasps of horror and disbelief.)
Feel better? Ok, moving on...
Yes I was a card carrying member of the GOP. I even was an elected officer in the College Republicans. I campaigned for Reagan-Bush as a Young Republican and for Bush-Quayle '88 as a College Republican. In a box in my closet are framed photos of yours truly with the likes of Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, Dan Quayle, Bob and Elizabeth Dole and even the late Lee Atwater. (Former Chairman of the GOP).
Yes I was a card carrying member of the GOP. I even was an elected officer in the College Republicans. I campaigned for Reagan-Bush as a Young Republican and for Bush-Quayle '88 as a College Republican. In a box in my closet are framed photos of yours truly with the likes of Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, Dan Quayle, Bob and Elizabeth Dole and even the late Lee Atwater. (Former Chairman of the GOP).
The GOP I belonged to wasn't a big bucket of crazy, it was the party that stood for individual freedom as well as individual and collective responsibility. So what happened? Simple, in 1992 the Republican Party lost its mind, and then its soul. The GOP went nuts and truth, became negotiable. Pat Buchanon stood before the National Convention and declared the GOP must fiight a "Culture War" for the soul of America.
Now in 2014 we see the full bloom of the rancid weed that was planted during that speech.
I didn't leave the GOP, the Republican Party as it had existed since the election of President Lincoln ceased to exist in 1992. Let's be very clear when I talk about the Republican Party, or the GOP of today, it not just the political party itself anymore. I am referring to both the Party itself, and the conservative media bubble that has encompassed it, creating a hermetically sealed bubble. An echo chamber of talking points that only support one narrative; Bipartisanship is bad. Obama is evil, and you can only trust FOX News, WorldNet Daily and Rush Limbaugh.
Dwight Eisenhower viewed war is always a last desperate resort, and an unchecked military industrial complex is a threat to democracy. Today's GOP sees an unchecked military industrial complex as more important than the health and welfare of the American People.
Richard Nixon understood that we live in a world of interconnected global relationships. Constructive engagement and detente' are always more successful than direct conflict. Today's GOP blusters "You are with us or against us". To seek the cooperation of Foreign Leader or even to have respect of citizens of other nations is ridiculed as a sign of weakness.
Gerald Ford truly believed in duty, and that the interests of the nation are more important than polls or elections. He was a living example on how accepting responsibility for the actions you take in office, is a president's first obligation. Today's GOP sees transparency as a threat and can never under ANY circumstances admit a mistake.
Ronald Reagan saw that to achieve PEACE through strength, America's allies were the key to America's security. He knew that Big Government is never a substitute for American Ingenuity, and he understood that Faith is a private matter not a poltical platform. Today's GOP uses faith is political tool. America's historic allies are disposable, and big Government is the greatest evil there is, EXCEPT when it can make the GOP base happy.
George HW Bush said it best in his inaugural address; "In crucial things, unity, in important things diversity, and in all things generosity... When America says something, America means it. Whether a treaty an agreement or a vow made on marble steps." He used Personal diplomacy to build a grand coalition of nations the likes of which had not been seen since World War II.
Today's GOP thinks that the Geneva Convention is "Outdated and quaint", "public" meetings should only be open to hand picked supporters. And has given us a nation more divided than at anytime since the civil war. Eager to start wars for ego and money, with no thought to the costs either monetary or in human terms.
My Grandfather's Republican Party fought for smaller, less intrusive Government. Today's GOP fights to amend the constitution to regulate the bedrooms and bodies of American Women. Along with a pledge to make the Federal Government the most intrusive entity into the private lives of Americans in History. My Grandfather's Republican Party sought to make the US the leader of Strong Global Alliances. Today's GOP loves to bash the UN, and loves to demand that the United States act unilaterally and recklessly, and trashes diplomacy calling it weak.
My Grandfather's Republican Party understood fiscal responsibility, and that Jobs are the engine of the American Economy. Today's GOP, gave us massive Debt and deficits. Policies that tax the Lower and Middle Class to pay for tax breaks for the most wealthy, resulting in the loss of more jobs on their watch than any time since the days of Herbert Hoover.
This past week at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) we heard a great deal about the GOP's "respect for life", an easily packaged label for a zealous push to eliminate reproductive rights for American women, and achieve theologically based government regulation of how life begins and ends.
"Defending families" is the GOP the code phrase for a zealous push to deny any and all, rights, to Gay and Lesbian Americans no matter what the cost. There was lots of talk about the importance of the 2nd and 1st Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, (in that order). Yet in the minds of the CPAC faithful, the Bill of Rights stops there,
Heath Care for the millions of Americans left uninsured and ignored for decades, is decried as an attack on the very fabric of the Nation. Families living in poverty ridiculed as "takers" for needing food stamps to help feed their children. Veterans who served with honor and distinction are discarded as being part of a "Culture of Entitlement" for wanting the respect of and help from the nation they served. Americans who have lost loved ones in Iraq or Afghanistan are seen as annoying reminders of past blunders, and distractions from the new drumbeat for war with Iran.
Rather than stand for the principles that guided the Republican Party for over 130 years, in 1992 the GOP embraced not the better angels of its nature, but the darker demons. For Today's GOP, facts are their own inconvenient truths, so they are overlooked and decried as a plot to discredit Conservative ideas by the "liberal lame stream media".
For today's GOP the "culture of life" ends at the prison door. The Neo-Conservative Right, may hate abortion, but they love capital punishment. Today's GOP will rush to defend the lives of the unborn. Yet after you come out of the womb however, you get to join the GOP's "ownership society" - meaning you are on your own.
We live in a time when the Republican Party seeks to define "American" as only those people who conform to a particular limited , fearful view of the world. It is a political party that history will remember for a legacy of "fifty percent plus one."
It is a Party that sees the key to victory, as being able to divide people as much as they can, then prevent any who oppose them from having equal access to the political process. Be they people of color, people who don't speak English, or people who are not Conservative Evangelical Heterosexuals.
I look at the Party calling itself "Republican", and I don't recognize it, at all. What's more, I don't think any of those aforementioned great men would recognize it either.
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
A bit of Catch Up Blogging...
Yeah yeah... I know. Blogs been a bit quiet.
The 50 Billion Dollar Putin-palooza that was the 2014 Winter Olympics ended with fireworks and the folks in Sochi even poking fun at their own mishaps over the course of the Games. Dancers recreated the technical glitch from the opening ceremony when one of the five Olympic rings failed to open. So fair play to Sochi.
Meanwhile back in the United States, the American Taliban finally decided it was tired of losing the culture war and decided to strike back Putin-Style at LGBT Americans, and try to pass "religious freedom projection laws". Which are laws that basically say, you can violate any civil rights laws you want by claiming that God told you to. Yes, you read that correctly. The state of Arizona is one of the first to go so far as to actually pass such a law. The question now is whether Arizona's Republican Governor, Jan Brewer will sign it into law.
But Arizona is just the tip of the bigotry iceberg. A a number of other conservative states, including, Kansas, Tennessee and Georgia, have similar legislation working its way through their respective state legislatures. All this taking place in the shadow of Russia's modern day "Nuremberg Laws" targeting Gays and Lesbians, and the American Taliban's latest overseas achievement, in Uganda.
The idea that it should be legal to discriminate against someone because your particular religion says so, is not new. Women and other minorities are marginalized in many parts of the world solely on basis of religious edict.
The Wing Nuts on the American Religious and Cultural right wing, realizing they can't win the debate on facts, and seeing the massive shift in attitudes on cultural issues; Have decided the best defense is to claim that THEY are the real victims here , and granting equality to people they don't like, is an "attack" on their religious beliefs.
Of course the chance of these new state laws, should they be enacted, actually surviving the legal challenges that would most certain follow, are remote at best. Yet it signals an interesting shift in the tactics of anti-Gay American Taliban. It also presents a real opportunity for the Religious Left to stand up for the religious freedom of people who actually follow the teachings of Christ. Or as Seattle-based writer/activist Dan Savage calls them, NALT (Not All Like That) Christians.
Dan has a point...
The 50 Billion Dollar Putin-palooza that was the 2014 Winter Olympics ended with fireworks and the folks in Sochi even poking fun at their own mishaps over the course of the Games. Dancers recreated the technical glitch from the opening ceremony when one of the five Olympic rings failed to open. So fair play to Sochi.
Meanwhile back in the United States, the American Taliban finally decided it was tired of losing the culture war and decided to strike back Putin-Style at LGBT Americans, and try to pass "religious freedom projection laws". Which are laws that basically say, you can violate any civil rights laws you want by claiming that God told you to. Yes, you read that correctly. The state of Arizona is one of the first to go so far as to actually pass such a law. The question now is whether Arizona's Republican Governor, Jan Brewer will sign it into law.
But Arizona is just the tip of the bigotry iceberg. A a number of other conservative states, including, Kansas, Tennessee and Georgia, have similar legislation working its way through their respective state legislatures. All this taking place in the shadow of Russia's modern day "Nuremberg Laws" targeting Gays and Lesbians, and the American Taliban's latest overseas achievement, in Uganda.
The idea that it should be legal to discriminate against someone because your particular religion says so, is not new. Women and other minorities are marginalized in many parts of the world solely on basis of religious edict.
The Wing Nuts on the American Religious and Cultural right wing, realizing they can't win the debate on facts, and seeing the massive shift in attitudes on cultural issues; Have decided the best defense is to claim that THEY are the real victims here , and granting equality to people they don't like, is an "attack" on their religious beliefs.
Of course the chance of these new state laws, should they be enacted, actually surviving the legal challenges that would most certain follow, are remote at best. Yet it signals an interesting shift in the tactics of anti-Gay American Taliban. It also presents a real opportunity for the Religious Left to stand up for the religious freedom of people who actually follow the teachings of Christ. Or as Seattle-based writer/activist Dan Savage calls them, NALT (Not All Like That) Christians.
Dan has a point...
Wednesday, February 05, 2014
Sochi 2014, The IOC reaps what it has sown...
With the countdown to the 2014 Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia now figured in hours, the world's attention has slowly begun to turn to the sleepy sub tropical resort town that is to host the games. What they are finding is not terribly surprising...
Humor aside, the IOC has, through either complicity or incompetence allowed the one of the most corrupt regimes in the world to stand on the global stage, hands stained with blood of their own LGBT citizens, and pockets stuffed with Billions of dollars in kickback cash. All wrapped in the legitimacy of the Olympic Movement..
Lets set aside for just a moment moment, the most disturbing issue facing the International Olympic Committee; Their tacit support and enabling of the violent percecution of LBGT Russians, and instead talk about what has become the most expensive and most corrupt Olympic Games in history.
IOC President, Thomas Bach has decided the best thing for him to do is to stand in front of the world, look reality in the eye and just pretend not to see it. His recent press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, was a epic display of denial soaked in desperate self-justification. Completely ignoring the elephants in the room, Bach instead insisted the real problem is all those pesky nay-sayers badmouthing Sochi and his new BFF Vladimir Putin.
The process by which the IOC awarded the 2014 Winter Games to Sochi is at best, ridiculously suspect. Bach and IOC's tone-deaf, fingers in ears, "la- la-la! Can't hear you!! Nothing is wrong!" response, has only served to further undermine what little credibility the IOC had left.
Unable to resist adding his voice to the chorus of ignorance and idiocy led by Putin and Bach, the Mayor of Sochi chimed in with his two rubles worth, claiming there weren't any Gay people in Sochi so all the international furor over persecution of LGBT Russians was not a relevant issue. The Young Turks had a field day with that one...
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Dear San Francisco...
It was three years ago this week that i accepted an invitation to a job interview, that along with a series of other events, led to my finally leaving San Francisco that April, and moving here to London.
Yet there are nights like this one... where it is unseasonably warm for late January in London, and a slight fog hangs in air, when I do think of you, and you are missed.
Oh well...
(Now before the great city of London takes any umbrage at this post, let me say that obviously moving here was one of the greatest things ever to happen to me, on both a personal and professional level.)
Yet there are nights like this one... where it is unseasonably warm for late January in London, and a slight fog hangs in air, when I do think of you, and you are missed.
Oh well...
Tuesday, January 07, 2014
The Ethics of "Outing"
The progressive blogosphere has been all a buzz over the past few days over the potential "outing" of a Conservative Republican Congressman as Gay. The Young Turks give us the details...
The Congressman in question is Aaaron Schock of Illinois, who has faced questions about his sexuality in the past. The initial posting by Journalist Itay Hod, and the subsequent coverage over on Americablog, has once again put the issue of "outing" on the front page of the LGBT blogs. A number of people have asked me what I thought about all this. It's a complex question.
There are two schools of thought here, which can simplistically be described at the Privacy Argument and the Hypocrisy Argument. The first is pretty simple to understand. I don't know anyone who has come through the process of Coming Out, who couldn't tell you in vivid detail of the terror, and yes that is the word for it; The terror they felt at one time or another that they might be outed to friends, family, employers or anyone else for that matter, before they were ready to Come Out.
The Congressman in question is Aaaron Schock of Illinois, who has faced questions about his sexuality in the past. The initial posting by Journalist Itay Hod, and the subsequent coverage over on Americablog, has once again put the issue of "outing" on the front page of the LGBT blogs. A number of people have asked me what I thought about all this. It's a complex question.
outing -ˈaʊtɪŋ noun
- 1.the practice of revealing the homosexuality of a prominent person.
- "the outing of gays by the press" -
synonyms: exposure, unmasking, uncovering, revelation, exposé
It is a fear that drives many LGBT people to suicide. The tragic case of 18 year old Rutgers University student Tyler Clementi, who committed suicide after being outed by his roommate, is one of countless cases where the result of either being outed, or the fear of being outed has been a direct factor in the tragic death of someone who was Gay.
Consequently, Outing is seen by many as a grotesque invasion of privacy, and something that can never be justified. I can appreciate that argument. After all, having faced that terror for years, growing up, it is something I would never want to intentionally inflict on anyone, even my worst enemy. Which interestingly enough leads right into the counter argument for Outing.
It is the argument that outing people who are Gay, but who actively work against LGBT rights, is justified. people who live a double life of attacking LGBT people by day, and sleeping with them by night. People like George Rekers . The prominent anti gay activist and proponent of the discredited practice of "Reparative Therapy". (The idea you can change Sexual Orientation through religion-based counseling.) A practice that has been directly responsible for the deaths of uncounted Gay and Lesbian youth, who in despair over being unable to change who there are, took their own lives.
Rekers was outed by a reporter when he returned from a European Vacation with a young gay male escort he had hired and taken with him on the trip. So the argument goes that the Outing of people like Rekers, and Congressman Schock, is a justified response to their own hypocrisy, and the damage their actions have done to other LGBT people.
Yet interestingly enough, the basic issue still remains the same. Fear. It is a fear of being outed that drives homophobia in many people. Causing some closeted LGBT people to act out in ways that they feel will help convince others (and themselves), that they are really straight. They see their actions as the way to fight the feelings they are struggling with. Feelings they desperately want to see as just some sort of temporary anomaly. Research has shown that many of the people who demonstrate the most pronounced discomfort with Homosexuality are if fact reacting to what they fear most in themselves.
There are many who argue that Congressman Schock's 100% record of voting against LGBT rights, and his public pronouncements against equal rights for LGBT Americans stands in such stark contrast to his personal conduct behind closed doors, that it warrants public exposure. I myself blogged extensively about the Rekers scandal, and at the time basically said that any public humiliation and harm that George Rekers suffered as a result of being outed, was not only justified but far was probably far less than what he deserved.
So why I am feeling squeamish about the outing of Aaron Schock?
I don't really know exactly. Part of me feels that Schock is not "important enough", to warrant being outed. One could argue that Schock has never been the deciding vote on any of the major issues we are talking about here. His anti-gay actions, whatever the motivation, have not prevented Illinois from becoming a state where Marriage Equality is the law of the land.
Yet, at the same time I can understand why many people are opposed to giving Congressman Schock a pass, if he IS gay. As his actions in Congress certainly reek of hypocrisy. I have known other Republican politicians who are Gay , or who I certainly believed were Gay, and often wondered how they reconciled their public actions with who they truly are. It must be said, Coming Out is not easy. It is a tumultuous and at times terrifying process of self acceptance and discovery.
Looking back on my own journey, I can in partially empathize with people like Congressman Aaron Schock. I was a College Republican until I finally left the GOP in 1992. When the anti-gay rhetoric and policies became more than I could in my own deep dark closet, ignore. Yet up to that point, I had campaigned and voted for Ronald Reagan, and George HW Bush. So you could say, in my own small way, I helped enable the massage damage both those Presidencies wreaked upon the LGBT community. Yet as with most things in life, the issues we face, and choices we make when living in that state of constant fear, otherwise known as, "the closet", are never as black and white as many would like to claim.
If Aaron Schock is Gay, I can only hope he realizes what people like former RNC Chair Ken Mehlman, and other people who once were driven by their own internalized homophobia to work against the rights of people just like them, have discovered. Coming Out is not only liberating, but you find a community that is first and foremost, accepting and yes... forgiving.
After all, most of us have been there too, and can honestly say that life truly is better on the other side of that closet door.
Wednesday, January 01, 2014
Tempus Fugit... Time Flies- Farewell 2013, Welcome 2014!
We begin with a bit of trivia courtesy of Wikipedia...
This year we actually managed to avoid the crowds in Central London and instead opted for a quiet New Year's at home watching the various celebrations unfold both here in London and around the world.
Reading posts on the various social media platforms, it seems there are lots of people around the world who are not sad to see 2013 depart. It has been a difficult year for many. Economic pressures around the world, while easing somewhat in places, remain an issue for vast majority of people. We have seen a largely jobless recovery that seems to be benefiting a the top 1% far more than it has helped anyone else yet.
"Auld Lang Syne" (Scots pronunciation: [ˈɔːl(d) lɑŋˈsəin]: note "s" rather than "z") is a Scots poem written by Robert Burns in 1788 and set to the tune of a traditional folk song (Roud # 6294). The song's Scots title may be translated into English literally as "old long since", or more idiomatically, "long long ago", or "days gone by" or "old times". Consequently "For auld lang syne", as it appears in the first line of the chorus, might be loosely translated as "for (the sake of) old times".
Reading posts on the various social media platforms, it seems there are lots of people around the world who are not sad to see 2013 depart. It has been a difficult year for many. Economic pressures around the world, while easing somewhat in places, remain an issue for vast majority of people. We have seen a largely jobless recovery that seems to be benefiting a the top 1% far more than it has helped anyone else yet.
For us, 2013 was not a bad year but it was challenging. My travel schedule was insane having started the year with a trip to Hong Kong, then hitting the Middle East, Central Europe, North America, then back to Germany and Poland, and finishing up the year last month back in Hong Kong. Thankfully 2014 promises to be a year of considerably less business travel.
One bright spot this year were dramatic changes in the US around the issue of Same Sex Marriage, along with our own American wedding, in San Francisco last July. (We were already legal spouses here in the UK through our Civil Partnership) Consequently, a question we have been asked regularly this year, is will be be moving back to the United States?
That is a complex issue and frankly, there isn't a simply yes or no answer to that. Yes, we would like at some point, to move back to the U.S., but No, we don't know exactly when that will be.
Also, we look across the pond and see the state of affairs back in the United States, and frankly it doesn't inspire an overwhelming rush to pack up and move back. The end of 2013 saw the Republican Party double down on the Obama Derangement Syndrome that has defined them for the last 5 years. A move that has accomplished nothing, other than critically damaging the GOP's chances of ever again being a national governing party.
Yet stupidity cloaked in political ideology is not solely an American prerogative. Here in the United Kingdom, Britain's own version of the "tea party" are the folks over at the United Kingdom Independence Party or "UKIP". Like their Duck Dynasty loving cousins across the pond, UKIP has decided that trying to make voters scared of people who are not white anglo-saxons is the best way to take votes away from Britain's Conservative Party. The effort however, rather like a Sarah Palin Book tour, has not been going well.
\
We are optimistic about 2014 though. It will be a year of big changes for Eric and myself. Later this month I will leave my current role with Buro Happold after a wonderful 3 years as their head of Learning and Development, and move on to an exciting new role leading global L&D efforts back in the Financial Services sector. It is in many ways coming full circle for me. Having had my first senior role in Corporate Learning years ago, with the global Dutch bank ABN AMRO.
In wishing a Happy New Year to all our friends and family around the world, we are so grateful for your love and friendship. To our families in the United States in New Jersey, Wisconsin and California, in Malaysia, in Kuala Lumpur and Malacca and here in the UK in North London. We love you all and hope to see more of you in 2014.
To our incredible "extended family", our friends scattered all over the globe. We think of and miss you all. From folks back in LA and San Francisco, CA to Dallas, Houston and San Antonio TX, Omaha NE, Chicago, IL, Madison and Milwaukee WI, New York, NY, Knoxville, TN, Seattle, WA, Portland, OR, Latrobe, PA., Winchendon and Wilmington, MA. Columbus and Dahlonega GA. Sydney and Melbourne Australia, Osan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Toronto, Brussels, Kuala Lumpur , Amsterdam, Lisbon and Sao Paulo , and of course here in London. To name only a few of the corners of the world where we are blessed to have amazing friends.
To all of you we can only say how much we hope to see you at some point in 2014, and remind you that we do have a rather nice guest room here.... just sayin'...
Happy New Year Everyone. Here's to 2014! May it bring all that you hope for, and more.
Love,
David & Eric
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)