Well, It's been over
a month. So I have been diligently scanning all the
major news outlets, government websites, and emergency services. As of today, I have discovered something really odd... I was shocked to learn
that in the United States, this past month, apparently none of the following things
have happened.
·
A mad rush of people marrying their pets...
·
Pandemic Polygamy
·
All across America, Kindergarten students taught classes on Gay
sex
·
Scores of Clergy rounded up and put in prison for preaching
·
Marriage as a civil institution collapsing and millions of
Heterosexual couples getting divorced
·
America as a Nation overrun by godless hordes bent on enslaving
our people and destroying our very way of life.
·
A complete stop to opposite Sex couples in America having
Children
Which
is quite odd when you think about it. Because recently, I got married. (That in and of
itself is not the odd part.) But rather it is the lack of anything odd happing
as a result of it, that is strange. After
all, I can't even count the number of times I have heard the cadre of
self-proclaimed "Family Values” culture warriors, spew dire warnings of doom, gloom, apocalypse
and general hubbub and brouhaha should Eric and I ever get married.
Well,
guess what? Last month, on July 9th at
1:30 pm at San Francisco City
hall, Eric and I got .married. So.... Where are all the promised
apocalyptic consequences? Where are the mass divorces of all the marriages we
supposedly "attacked" one month ago, by tying the knot ? Where is all
the promised damage to millions of children who are now, (according to social
conservatives), so confused as to what a marriage is? Where
are the plagues of frogs, locusts and boils? Where is the collapse of Western
civilization as we know it, due to its very foundation being rent asunder by the
HORROR of Eric and I getting married one month ago?
Nothing?
.... Anyone? ... Anybody? ... Really? How terribly disappointing. After all, groups like the National Organization for (some people's) Marriage went to so much trouble making spooky television ads warning everybody about what would happen...
For years now ,
whenever the subject of marriage equality comes up as part of our national
discourse, those opposed to equal rights
for all Americans have liked to say it
is an "attack" on marriage and the family. So I decided to look up
the word `attack' in the dictionary. The
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines it as:
Attack
Pronunciation: &-'tak
Function: verb
1 : to set upon or work against forcefully
2 : to assail with unfriendly or bitter words
3 : to begin to affect or to act on injuriously
4 : to set to work on
5 : to threaten (a piece in chess) with immediate capture
Pronunciation: &-'tak
Function: verb
1 : to set upon or work against forcefully
2 : to assail with unfriendly or bitter words
3 : to begin to affect or to act on injuriously
4 : to set to work on
5 : to threaten (a piece in chess) with immediate capture
Hmmm…
to set upon or work against forcefully huh? Ok, so if we take the James
Dobsons, Pat Robertsons and Bryan
Fischers of the world seriously, it would mean that for Eric and I to have the same rights as any other
couple; Not more rights, not any new
rights that other couples do not currently have, but only the exact same rights, it would
injure, damage and potentially even destroy heterosexual marriages and families.
Wow….Uh..
ok.. How exactly?
Does
the fact of my marriage now mean that other married couples have lost ANY of the 1,100 federal benefits
and protections that they had one month ago? Does the fact that I am now
married mean other married couples can no longer file joint tax returns, have, adopt or raise
children, pass on social security survivor benefits, or make medical decisions
for each other?Does
my being married now mean that people will no longer want to even get married.
and if they are married, will now want to get divorced?
In short, has ANYONE's marriage or family changed in any way as result of what happened at San Francisco City Hall last month?
In short, has ANYONE's marriage or family changed in any way as result of what happened at San Francisco City Hall last month?
The
answer of course, is no. None of the Right Wing talking points on same sex
marriage stand up to even basic common sense. But it's pretty clear that common
sense isn't something that the Right
Wing likes to deal in very much. The
“National Organisation for Marriage” (NOM) likes to say that gay marriage cheapens or lessens the
value of the institution of marriage in the eyes of society. But since none of
the rights or benefits that a married couple enjoys have changed in any way as
result of my marriage; What social conservatives are really saying is that for THEM , Eric and I
getting married has cheapened THEIR own
marriages in THEIR own eyes.
My
getting married means I now have something that, according to NOM only heterosexuals are supposed to have .
And that makes them mad. It's not just
that they wanted to prevent Eric and I from having equal rights, It was about making sure that we didn't have any rights at all.. Tony
Perkins and his ilk, see equal rights for us, as an attack on them.
That's interesting...
Let's
be honest, for the anti-gay industry, (
and yes, it is an industry)
this was never about "protecting marriage". It's about people they don’t like having the same rights as they
do, and that makes them mad. Even though their lives clearly have not changed in ANY way, these
conservative crybabies howl about
“activist judges” and firmly believe that marriage now has less value, lower status, and the institution itself,
could come to an end. All because Eric and I were able to get married last
Month.
It suddenly occurs to me there is a word for someone who is irrationally fixated on the preservation of inequality, that they feel is in their favor. It turns out, Merriam-Webster's dictionary has the same word for it.
It suddenly occurs to me there is a word for someone who is irrationally fixated on the preservation of inequality, that they feel is in their favor. It turns out, Merriam-Webster's dictionary has the same word for it.
Bigot
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot
1: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own
opinions and prejudices
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot
1: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own
opinions and prejudices
1 comment:
Well written post! You've hit the nail on the head perfectly. For some portion of humanity the only way they can live to to hate another group. Logic means nothing to them, there is no getting thru their firewalls. They hate therefore they are.
Post a Comment