"LGBT rights are not special rights; they are human rights." - President Barack Obama
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
January 27, 2011
Statement by the President on the Killing of David Kato
I am deeply saddened to learn of the murder of David Kato. In Uganda, David showed tremendous courage in speaking out against hate. He was a powerful advocate for fairness and freedom. The United States mourns his murder, and we recommit ourselves to David’s work.
At home and around the world, LGBT persons continue to be subjected to unconscionable bullying, discrimination, and hate. In the weeks preceding David Kato’s murder in Uganda, five members of the LGBT community in Honduras were also murdered. It is essential that the Governments of Uganda and Honduras investigate these killings and hold the perpetrators accountable.
LGBT rights are not special rights; they are human rights. My Administration will continue to strongly support human rights and assistance work on behalf of LGBT persons abroad. We do this because we recognize the threat faced by leaders like David Kato, and we share their commitment to advancing freedom, fairness, and equality for all.
(hat tip to Wonkette for finding this amazing video.)
I have often blogged about how the Conservative Religious Right in the United States has the same overall aims as the Taliban in Afghanistan. While their methods are NOT the same. (though the family of Dr. George Tiller might disagree...) Their overall aims are very similar. They seek to take their religious beliefs and turn those beliefs into civil law.
One of the great ironies of the Conservative movement is how many of their key leaders love to scream hysterically about some completely non-existent "threat" of Islamic or "Sharia" law. While at the same time seeking to impose a nearly identical form of religious law on the United States.
For all their rants about the threat of "Big Government" , these people have NO problem with idea that government should have total control over a women's reproductive health.
They have NO problem with Government saying what can and cannot happen in your bedroom, and they clearly believe the First Amendment applies ONLY to them. Their religious beliefs are the only ones that are "real" and therefore are the only ones that merit Government support and protection.
This fact, while always understood within the religious right, has never really been advocated publicly out in the open. That is until now. Michael Voris of Real Catholic TV recently explained why the United States needs a Christian dictator. One of his main reasons is that pro-gay, pro-abortion "parasitic" liberals get to vote. You may want to sit down before you watch this lunatic...
I have always said that people like Tony Perkins at the "Family Research Council", Pat Robertson, and James Dobson over at "Focus on the Family" , hate our democracy. They know that when faced with putting their true beliefs before the electorate they lose. Normally I would not waste time or blog space on these people, because they make it far too easy to ridicule them. They are so filled with hate against Americans and anyone else for that matter who is not made in their image.
That Video is the very definition of irrational religous-based hatred. And for once I find myself in agreement with George W. Bush. When asked to explain why there are groups and people who hate America, his patented response was always; "the extremists hate our freedoms." And he was absolutely right.
The American Evangelical Right, like their Islamic fundamentalist cousins, cannot abide a pluralistic society.
These Fundamentalist Christian Jihadists clearly hate the United States Constitution. The right to control one's own life, body, mind and spirit is a threat to them, and frankly scares them silly. They hate our freedoms. Yet the wonderful irony is that our system of pluralism, and the freedoms it provides is what gives the people like Michael Voris the right to spew his craziness all over the internet.
Make no mistake, or as President Obama might say; "let me be clear...", if people like Voris, Dobson, and Perkins had their way, only those people who march in lockstep with them, would have the right to vote.
Wow...
What came through the loudest in the SOTU last night was confirmation of everything we have seen over the past two years. Barack Obama is not a liberal or a progressive, he is a pro-business centrist.
I think part of the reason GOP obstruction has so baffled him, is because in truth the President feels that he and the GOP want essentially the same things, only in slightly different packaging.
The President's passing reference to "Don't Ask Don't Tell" was about as significant as GOP Respondent Paul Ryan's attempt to placate the Tea Part by invoking "the Founders". The Progressive base of the Democratic Party knows that when President Obama talks about progressive social issues, it means he would be willing to smile and take credit as he signs a bill, AFTER Congressional Democrats carry ALL the water to get it passed.
What was most significant about the speech tonight was what was NOT said.
For anyone hoping for movement on Marriage or Workplace equality, the restoration of sanity to our gun control laws, or a clear non-negotiable commitment to protect Social Security, the President's message was clear....
The Obama Administration will gladly sacrifice a progressive social agenda to cut deals on a centrist economic one.
Well, It's been a whole week. And after scanning all the major news outlets all over the country for the past seven days, I discovered something really odd...
I was shocked to learn that in the United States, this past week, apparently none of the following things have happened.
A mad rush of people marrying their pets...
Pandemic Polygamy
All across America Kindergarten students taught classes on Gay sex...
Scores of Clergy rounded up and put in prison for preaching...
Marriage as a civil institution collapsing and millions of Heterosexual couples getting divorced...
America as a Nation overrun by godless hordes bent on enslaving our people and destroying our very way of life.
Opposite Sex couples in America completely stopping having Children...
Which is quite odd when you think about it. Because exactly one week ago, I got married. (That in and of itself is not the odd part.) But rather it is the lack of anything odd happing as a result of it, that is strange.
After all, I can't even count the number of times I have heard You, and your cadre of self-proclaimed "Family Values" proponents spew dire warnings of doom, gloom, apocalypse and general hubbub and brouhaha should Eric and I ever get married.
Well, guess what? We are now married, and have been for an entire week.
So.... Where are all the promised apocalyptic consequences? Where are the mass divorces of all the marriages Eric and I supposedly "attacked" one week ago, by tying the knot ourselves? Where is all the promised damage to millions of children who are now, (according to you), so confused as to what a marriage is?
Where are the plagues of frogs, locusts and boils? Where is the collapse of Western civilization as we know it, due to its very foundation being rent asunder by the HORROR of Eric and I getting married one week ago today?
Nothing? .... Anyone? ... Anybody? ... Really?
How terribly disappointing, And after you went to all that trouble to pay those actors to look so scared.
For years now , whenever the subject of marriage equality comes up as part of our national discourse, You claim it is an "attack" on marriage and the family. So I decided to look up the word `attack' in the dictionary. The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines it as:
Attack
Pronunciation: &-'tak
Function: verb
1 : to set upon or work against forcefully
2 : to assail with unfriendly or bitter words
3 : to begin to affect or to act on injuriously
4 : to set to work on
5 : to threaten (a piece in chess) with immediate capture Hmmm… to set upon or work against forcefully huh? Ok, so if we take your argument seriously, for Eric and I to have the same rights as any other couple, not more rights, not any new rights that other couples do not currently have, but only the exact same rights, would injure, damage and potentially even destroy heterosexual marriages and families.
Uh.. ok.. How exactly?
Does the fact of my marriage now mean that you have lost the 1,100 federal benefits and protections that you had eight days ago? Does the fact that I am now married mean you and your spouse can no longer file a joint tax return, have, adopt or raise children, pass on social security survivor benefits, or make medical decisions for each other?
Does my being married now mean that people will no longer want to even get married. and if they are married, will now want to get divorced? Has your marriage or family changed in any way as result of what happened to me and my spouse a week ago today?
The answer of course, is no. None of your talking points on same sex marriage stand up to even basic common sense. But it's pretty clear that common sense isn't something you deal in very much.
You say that gay marriage cheapens or lessens the value of the institution of marriage in the eyes of society. But since none of the rights or benefits that you enjoy have changed in any way as result of my marriage; What you are really saying is that for YOU, Eric and I getting married has cheapened your own marriage in your own eyes.
My getting married means I now have something that, (again, according to you,) only heterosexuals are supposed to have . And that makes you mad. It's not just that you wanted to prevent Eric and I from having equal rights, you want make sure that we don't have any rights at all..
You see equal rights for us, as an attack on you. That's interesting...
Let's be honest Maggie, this isn't about "protecting marriage". It's about people you don't like, having the same rights as you . Even though your life clearly has not changed in ANY way, you firmly believe that your marriage now has less value, lower status, and the institution itself, could come to an end. All because Eric and I were able to get married last Monday.
It suddenly occurs to me there is a word for someone who is irrationally fixated on the preservation of inequality, that they feel is in their favor. It turns out, Merriam-Webster's dictionary has the same word for it.
Bigot
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot
1: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own
opinions and prejudices
I am sitting here in the International Terminal at the San Francisco Airport (SFO), my flight to London will start boarding in about an hour or so. I only was back here in the states for 11 days. The reason for the quick turn-around however is very very cool...
That's right, after countless trips back and forth across the Atlantic, endless hours talking to each other over web cams and instant messenger, and SMS texts, Eric and I are finally getting married. Hence the need for the multiple trips back and forth .
The end of this long long LONG march down the aisle finally came into view on December 29th, when we went to our local county clerks office (Council Registry Office) in Lewisham, in South London. Where after much waiting and seperate "interviews" our names when up on a board in the hallway. Announcing to the good people of Lewisham our intention to tie the knot. Then we had to wait fifteen days and nights (which is really 16 days, they are not fooling anyone...) for anyone who had cause to object to formally do so. Shockingly enough, nobody did. which brings us to this next week.
On Monday, January 17th at Eleven O'Clock in the the morning Eric and I will walk back into the Lewisham Registry Office and do what many American Evangelical Conservatives have constant nightmares about. We will enter into a state sanctioned legally binding monogamous relationship between two consenting adults of no direct family relation...and the same gender. (gasp!)
The world is sure to come to to a cataclysmic end. So you better get out your "rapture jammies" now. So I can assume that all my conservative friends, who don't believe Eric and I have the same rights as they do to the "Pursuit of Happiness", will all be getting divorced next week. After all, according to their leaders, I am "attacking" their marriages.
James Dobson and his assorted ilk all have talked about their "fears" about what same sex marriage will do to America. Well boys, here's hoping we are the cause of your nightmares for years to come.
I have not blogged about the tragic events last weekend in Arizona. This is one issue, I have no problem letting President Obama speak of me, and all Americans...
(FROM CNN) -- A federal judge was killed and a congresswoman gravely wounded Saturday in a shooting outside of a Tucson, Arizona, grocery store, according to police and government officials.
In all, six people died and 12 were wounded in the shooting, including U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, according to Rick Kastigar, bureau chief for the Pima County Sheriff's Department.
President Barack Obama later said Chief Judge John Roll of the U.S. District Court for Arizona was among the dead.
A 9-year-old girl also died in the attack, according to authorities. The child, whose identity had not been released, was pronounced dead at a hospital.
Last year Representative Giffords was one of a number of Democratic members of Congress who were targeted with rifle scope crosshairs graphics in an ad from Sarah Palin's political action committee.
Palin and her Teabagger Nutjob followers have used violent rhetoric non-stop for the past two years. Talking of "second amendment solutions" to political questions. Now the seeds that Palin and her ilk have planted are sprouting.
Make no mistake the GOP and and the Tebagging lunatics it has spawned have BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS TODAY.
And ask her why has the U.S Government been SILENT on the death threats against Malaysian Civil Rights activists for their posted "Ït Gets Better" Videos. Secretary Clinton herself, posted an amazing video to the "It Gets Better" project eariler this year.
The silence from our State Department on these death threats, some made by Malaysian Government Officials, is very disturbing.
You can email the United States Department of State here.
As you may have been aware, Seksualiti Merdeka, which champions the human rights of sexually marginalised communities in Malaysia, particularly the rights of LGBTs, has come under fire recently for our video project "It Gets Better in Malaysia". Right now we are being overwhelmed by the majority view that we are destroying Malaysian society. The videos have been mistakenly interpreted as a series of coming out videos set to insult the country's religion. Nothing can be further from the truth. In our statement released last week, we said:
"It Gets Better in Malaysia is a video project about giving hope to young LGBT Malaysians: even though things can be rough during the teenage years, it can get better. This message is targeted at the minority of young Malaysians who are growing up as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT).
"This project is in response to accounts of suicides and attempted suicides by LGBT teenagers and adults. Statistics of such suicides are anywhere between three to six times higher than by heterosexuals. This is due to the overwhelming feelings of loneliness, fear or hopelessness that result from the stigma and discrimination against them. Most people have their families to turn to. For LGBT youths, even their own families can be a source of rejection. They have no one to turn to. We decided it is up to us who have survived similar situations to reach out to young LGBTs. This is why the project was born. It’s not about making coming out videos. It is about giving hope to youths at risk." (Read the full statement here:http://www.seksualitimerdeka.org/)
If anything, the widespread fear and ignorance towards LGBTs here, coupled with the state-sanctioned misunderstanding towards the community, prove that such messages of hope are necessary and vital. So far we have released 5 of the videos and intend to release more. But the one video that seemed to have attracted attention is the one by Azwan Ismail. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJLSteQIcms). And among the comments it attracted, some on blogs, are threats of violence, stoning and death towards him.
We have some support in blogs and commentaries, mainly in English-medium news portals. The mainstream news mainly carry articles quoting officials asking for action to be taken upon us. The individuals who have been quoted include Minister in Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom and Perak Mufti Datuk Sri Harussani Zakaria, in Berita Harian and The Star respectively, asking JAKIM to take appropriate action.
None of these people mentioned anything about the violent threats and death threats, almost as if legitimizing them. Harian Metro also ironically claimed Seksualiti Merdeka is threatening Muslims. (you can find the links to the articles at http://www.seksualitimerdeka.org/)
Only The Sun Daily and The Star mentioned the death threats against Azwan, but neither carried statements by Malaysian officials condemning the threats. (The Star carried the inteview by Associated Press.)
But for now we would like to request for the support from Malaysian NGOs, personalities and our supporters to speak up for us. Below are some ways you may help:
1. To oppose all threats of violence, stoning and death. One comment we saw asked for "sula" to be meted out. Another blog, after listing three ways of killing homosexuals, suggested that if the authorities don't take action, Muslims should not be blamed if they took actions into their own hands. Please oppose the legitimising of hate speech and violence.
2. To oppose insults, disparaging remarks and jokes made at the expense of LGBTs in Malaysia. To oppose discrimination of LGBTs who have committed no crime just being who they are.
3. To oppose criminalising and punishing LGBTs for being who they are. To oppose criminalising and punishing members of Seksualiti Merdeka for empowering marginalised communities and doing social work.
4. To support that we have done NOTHING to insult Islam. In fact, we are simply making it possible so that young people don't take their own lives. (But seeing all these hate going on, it might just prompt them instead.) In fact, we too believe that sexuality is a responsibility, no matter whether you are straight or LGBT. We want to be given a chance to show people how to be responsible with their own sexuality. This include being self-aware, self-accepting, as well as being aware and accepting of others. And respecting each other's rights.
5. To support allowing LGBTs in Malaysia to have avenues to express ourselves in order to create more understanding. This is included in the 4 recommendations at the end of our statement, which we hope you will support.
6. To support the human rights of all LGBTs in Malaysia regardless of their race, religion, age, gender identity or sexual orientation.
7. To support Seksualiti Merdeka's initiatives and the "It Gets Better in Malaysia" project.
We also hope you may offer your support, if possible, not only in English but also Bahasa Melayu, to be directed at the Malay-language media. We encourage you to write to the editors of the above publications, post blogs or facebook status or twitters to vocally support us.
Pang Khee Teik, one of Malaysia's most recognisable sexuality rights activists, shares his journey from being a schoolboy in Singapore who was often bullied by his classmates to undergoing reparative therapy at a church for 12 years to self-acceptance as a gay man.
He is one of Malaysia's most recognisable sexuality rights activists. His quote "Stop censoring who I am" was even Time Online's quote of the day on 25 Feb 2009. At the time he wrote a lengthy letter to the press to protest Malaysian cable TV operator Astro's decision to censor the words “gay” and “lesbian” from Sean Penn's and Dustin Lance Black's Oscar acceptance speeches – for their movie Milk about American gay rights activist Harvey Milk – in which they called for equal rights for gay men and lesbians.
Pang Khee Teik, 36, co-founder of Seksualiti Merdeka
Pang Khee Teik is also the co-founder of Seksualiti Merdeka, Malaysia's annual sexuality rights festival; and Arts Programme Director of The Annexe, Central Market.
In this video, the fifth of the It Gets Better in Malaysia series, Pang shares his journey to self-acceptance as a gay man from as a schoolboy in Singapore who was often bullied by his classmates to undergoing reparative therapy at a church for 12 years where he was told that being gay is wrong and it is possible to change one's orientation from gay straight.
"For 12 years, I stopped myself from loving. Every time I fell in love or had a crush on someone, a guy, I stopped myself. I did not allow my heart to feel what it needed to feel... There are many ways to kill yourself. One of the ways is to stop yourself from loving, to stop yourself from living. And for 12 years I did that. And I died slowly everyday. Until one day I realised and I asked myself what is wrong with love."
There is a lot that can, and will be said about all this I am sure. But frankly that can wait. What is important to say right now, is simply this;
Today the Congress of the United States finally agrees with the proposition that someone who is willing to risk his or her life to defend this nation should not be deemed LESS equal than the citizens they are defending.
Paul Butler, a Facebook engineering intern, transformed social data into a stunningly beautiful visual that outlines the geographical borders of Facebook friendships.
It worked like this--by using a random sample of ten million pairs of Facebook friends, Butler plotted both their locations and their connection to one another on a graph. By repeating that step with each member of his sample, Butler found that the resulting image formed the outline of a world map, with the most marked areas forming where major cities are located.
The result is this stunning map, which displays exactly what Butler had intended it to. "I was interested in seeing how geography and political borders affected where people lived relative to their friends. I wanted a visualization that would show which cities had a lot of friendships between them," he wrote on Facebook's engineering blog. (Which is also worth checking out for a more detailed explanation of his process plotting the map).
True, it's not exactly shocking that a visualization of Facebook friendship data shows that most connections are within short distances of one another and that major cities have more connections than remote regions. But so what? This map is so neat that it's worth the time this experiment likely took. (via All Facebook)
The since 2001, the Republican Party has long claimed that ONLY the GOP truly understood the implications of the terror attacks of September 11, 2001; and how "everything changed" on that day. In addition they often accuse the Democrats and President Obama of having a "Pre-9/11 mentality". (By which they mean soft on terrorism.)
In the years that have followed, the Republican Party turned the memory of 9/11 into their party's political brand. Wrapping all of their candidates and polices in the red-white-and blue cloak of "September the eleventh"...
Last night on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show", host Jon Stewart talked about the sheer hypocrisy of Republicans who have used the attacks of September 11th, 2001 as a political marketing campaign to claim they love America more than anyone else; while at the same time voting AGAINST help for first responders injured in the aftermath of those same terror attacks...
"So, let me get this straight - Larry King is getting his 8th divorce, Elizabeth Taylor is possibly getting married for a 9th time, Britney Spears had a 55 hour marriage. Jesse James and Tiger Woods are screwing EVERYTHING, yet the idea of same-sex marriage is going to destroy the institution of marriage?? ...Really??"
The Republican Party has discovered the sad and very inconvenient truth about Barack Obama, President Obama, is a good man, an intelligent man, who is very weak. President Obama is not a Leader, he is a negotiator, and not a very good one. On issue after issue, from Health Care Reform, to Wall Street Reform, Congressional Republicans, found that President Obama, seemed to prefer a really bad agreement, to no agreement.
As a result, the GOP learned very quickly , that it was all too easy to back the President into a corner, where his natural urge to "find common ground", meant he would abandon his stated principles and simply give in and give up. All the while making very eloquent statements about the value of bi-partisanship.
Today President Barack Obama apparently decided he doesn't want a second term. The great irony here is that he will likely suffer the same electoral fate as the first President Bush. George HW Bush agreed to the 1990 budget deal with Congressional Democrats. Then in 1992 the Democrats turned around and attacked Bush for breaking his "read my lips" pledge on no new taxes.
Make no mistake, in 2012 the GOP will firmly lay the deeper hole, that this "compromise" will dig in terms of the deficit and the National Debt, firmly at the feet of the President and the Democrats. You can almost see the ads, labeling the trillions of dollars of added debt as the "Obama Record".
This deal is the GOP's biggest Christmas wish come true. The Democrats have just lost their only real campaign issue. The wildly unpopular "Bush Tax Cuts for Millionaires and Billionaires" are now officially the "Obama Tax Cuts for Millionaires and Billionaires".
The one year extension of Unemployment Insurance benefits is a very good thing, but to think it could not have been accomplished with out caving in on tax cuts for the wealthiest of the wealthy is the biggest political cop-out since Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act.
With solid majorities in both houses of Congress the Obama Administration refused to even consider using even the threat of budget reconciliation to get his agenda through congress.
From National Public Radio: Budget reconciliation, a provision of the 1974 Congressional Budget Act, is designed to force committees to make changes in mandatory – or entitlement – spending and revenues. The rules for budget reconciliation in the Senate restrict the procedure to provisions dealing with the budget. They also set strict protocols for consideration of the bills in both chambers. Under the procedures for reconciliation bills, debate in both houses is limited to 20 hours, and no Senate filibusters are allowed.
Congress has used reconciliation occasionally for non-budget legislation, including rewriting health care and welfare policy, as the Republican majority did in passing major welfare reform in 1996. Resorting to budget reconciliation is the legislative equivalent of breaking out the heavy artillery in a pitched battle. Since the early 1980s, it has been used 19 times, primarily to steer controversial fiscal and budgetary policies through the Senate, including former President Bill Clinton’s fiscal 1994 deficit reduction and tax package and President George W. Bush’s major tax cuts.
So instead we have had two years of eloquent words, and abandoned priorities. I never thought I would look at the Obama Administration, and find myself wishing it was more like the fictional Bartlett Administration of "The West Wing".
It will be very hard for Democrats to campaign as the antidote to GOP fiscal insanity, when their track record is just as crazy.
Isn't the potential overturning of Prop 8 in CA...
Isn't the potential overturning of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"...
Isn't the long-overdue classification of Bigots like Tony Perkins as leaders of "Hate Groups" by the Southern Poverty Law Center...
Isn't Rachel Maddow, Dan Savage, Ellen Degeneres or even Ricky Martin...
Nope, the single biggest threat to ignorance, homophobia and bigotry in the United States today is obviously..
The State of Illinois this week approved Civil Unions for Gay and Lesbian Couples. Given the hate fueled hysteria on this issue across the border to the North in Wisconsin, it is so refreshing to see and hear simple common sense on this issue. Cue IL State Senator Rick Hendon...
The past week has been an amazing one in American Politics. As the outgoing lame duck Congress comes back into session to try to tie up a number of loose ends, the Republican Party has decided to double down on their strategy of preventing anything from getting done, no matter the cost.
In one of the most remarkable displays of politics at its worst, the outgoing GOP minority has decided that since they have ignored sanity, reason, and the good of American People for four years, why should they change now.
With over two million Americans facing the expiration of their unemployment compensation benefits at midnight tonight, with a vital arms reduction treaty with Russia awaiting ratification, and with pending action on the debt ceiling to insure ability of the Government itself to continue functioning; what do you suppose the GOP says is it's ONLY priority...
Tax cuts for the wealthiest of the wealthy. The top 2% of millionaires and billionaires. The GOP is so concerned about giving tax breaks to the richest of the rich that today they announced that they will prevent ANY and ALL other legislation from being voted on until the tax cuts for the uber-rich are passed. Rachel Maddow breaks it down for us.
So just to be clear, it is the official position of the Republican Party that Government stepping in to prevent over two million unemployed Americans from losing their only means of support is completely unacceptable, because it would add 60 Billion Dollars to the federal deficit in the short term. But giving tax cuts to the wealthiest people in America that would addmore than 700 Billion Dollars to the deficit... THAT is so important to Republicans that they will allow NOTHING else to get done until their tax cuts for the super rich are passed.
It is clear that in the mind of the GOP, anyone who dares point out that tax cuts for the mega rich do not create jobs or stimulate the broader economy, (a FACT that the past 8 years have clearly shown) must be a socialist who clearly hates America. The GOP loves to talk about Jobs, but has no desire to do ANYTHING that might actually create more of them. Again, Rachel Maddow takes us down the GOP's delusional garden path.
It is clear the if you are unemployed, or even if you are simply not among the wealthiest two percent of Americans, the Republican Party thinks you are clearly a lazy parasite and hates you for standing between them and their beloved tax breaks for the ultra-rich.
Happy Holidays America! For those of you who now will be destitute because the GOP wrecked the economy and you lost your job , and now have no unemployment benefits; The Republican opposition to you having affordable Health Care now makes sense. They want you to hurry up and die, to "decrease the surplus population..."
I hate writing about these idiots. I really do. But this a new low even for these anti-American, anti-Christian hate mongers.
The self-proclaimed "American Family Association" has thrown a hissy fit over a new policy from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The new rule states that hospitals that bill back to Medicare and Medicaid cannot deny visitation rights based on sexual orientation.
In other words, hospitals can't deny the same sex partner of a patient the right to visit them in the hospital. Something that until these new rules, was all too common in the United States. Even in cases where same-sex couples had medical powers of attorney.
Surely something as basic as allowing someone in the hospital to be visited by their loved ones couldn't possibly be controversial . After all, only a heartless, soulless bastard would say to someone; "We don't care who you love, you deserve to die alone..." This is a no brainer right?
Wrong. - Cue the hate filled hysteria on the America's wing nut bigoted Right. The American Family Association calls the rule "special visitation rights" under the headline "Fed To Hospitals: Go Gay Or Go Broke."
"Certainly there are Catholic hospitals and Baptist hospitals that recognize homosexual behavior as sinful behavior and they do not want to take part in affirming homosexual sin under the strong arm of the government."
This from Liberty Counsel's limp-wristed little spokesbigot, Matt Barber. Who objects to the new federal rules which stipulate that any hospital that receives Medicare or Medicaid funding must allow LGBT patients to be visited by their partners. The rule goes into effect in 60 days.
These anti-Constitutional hate mongers go on to say the new rule grants Gays and Lesbians "Special Visitation Rights". So according to the American Taliban, having the SAME rights to visit a loved one in the hospital just like anyone else, is a "special right" if you happen to be Gay or Lesbian.
For these obsessed bigots, extending ANY rights to LGBT Americans constitutes "special rights". To the point where these unbelievably evil people would oppose letting a patient in a hospital see his or her loved ones.
On their national radio show, these Nazi's decried how they could no longer force Gays and Lesbians to die alone..
These people are insane.. They are the domestic equivalent of the Taliban, seriously. They hate America, they hate our freedoms, they hate our diversity. They seek to take a narrow ultra fundamentalist religious perspective and make it the law of the land. They may not use the same tools and tactics, but their goals are no different than the radical clerics in the Middle East who seek to impose religious law on their own people.
The American Family Association is anything BUT an association for American families. They are a hate group, no different than the Klu Klux Klan.
Greetings from Kuala Lumpur, Arrived here last Monday, and am enjoying the 90 degree heat and humidty sooooo much. (Sarcasm alert...)
You know, I think I found the best way to deal with US election crazyness, vote early then leave the country for two weeks! Here for a short holiday with Eric to visit his family and actaully spend some quality time together in the same time zone for a change.
Have no fear dear readers, I have not abandoned you , and will have pleanty to say about the U.S. Midterm elections and how they were viewed from Asia, when I return to the States in two weeks.
